<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Naked Medicine and Smart Healthcare &#187; Medical Education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedmedicine.com/category/medical-education/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedmedicine.com</link>
	<description>Let&#039;s Face It: Medicine is Business! -- Hosted by Jane Chin, Ph.D. @janechin #pharma</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 04:49:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CME and Pharma: Doctors Want Support That They Can&#8217;t Trust</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/cme-and-pharma-doctors-want-support-that-they-cant-trust</link>
		<comments>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/cme-and-pharma-doctors-want-support-that-they-cant-trust#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 18:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Chin, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business of Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedmedicine.com/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Doctors want CMEs paid for them but can&#8217;t trust the people they want to help pay for their continuing medical education.&#8221; That&#8217;s how I sum up the below survey published by Archives of Internal Medicine. Look at what the conclusion said: &#8220;Although the medical professionals responding to this survey were concerned about bias introduced from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/cme-and-pharma-doctors-want-support-that-they-cant-trust/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updated Heart Attack Treatment Guidelines</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/updated-heart-attack-treatment-guidelines</link>
		<comments>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/updated-heart-attack-treatment-guidelines#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 01:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Chin, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Journals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedmedicine.com/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology have published updated treatment guidelines for heart attacks (or, as the journal article titled it, &#8220;Update of the Clinical Competence Statement on Cardiac Interventional Procedures&#8221;). The entire update is currently available in full from the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/updated-heart-attack-treatment-guidelines/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Backgrounder on Diabetes Drug Avandia Controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/backgrounder-on-diabetes-drug-avandia-controversy</link>
		<comments>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/backgrounder-on-diabetes-drug-avandia-controversy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Chin, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affordable Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business of Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Side of Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Journals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truth in Medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedmedicine.com/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been tracking the various developments and commentaries on the controversy surrounding diabetes drug Avandia (rosiglitazone, manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline). For those of you interested in background information and commentaries relating to the use of Avandia and increased risk for heart disease, as well as the affordability of chronic medications like diabetes drugs, I&#8217;ve compiled a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/backgrounder-on-diabetes-drug-avandia-controversy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Much Vermont Psychiatrists and Endocrinologists Received from Drug Companies</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/how-much-vermont-psychiatrists-and-endocrinologists-received-from-drug-companies</link>
		<comments>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/how-much-vermont-psychiatrists-and-endocrinologists-received-from-drug-companies#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Chin, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business of Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truth in Medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedmedicine.com/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gardiner Harris of New York Times wrote about Vermont&#8217;s disclosure of the amount of funds that the states doctors received from drug companies. While the focus was on psychiatrists, because they received top total dollars, I was particularly intrigued that endocrinologists as a specialty followed a close second. Those of you familiar with the field [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/how-much-vermont-psychiatrists-and-endocrinologists-received-from-drug-companies/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Truth in Medical Marketing and CMEs</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/truth-in-medical-marketing-and-cmes</link>
		<comments>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/truth-in-medical-marketing-and-cmes#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 20:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Chin, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business of Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truth in Medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manifestyourinspiration.com/blognetwork/wordpress/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently newsgroup user jkellymdmph asked a question that I had brought up when Google Co-op Health first launched: How can this group health effort can resist infiltration by aggressive marketing? jkellymdmph goes on to describe a continuing medical education (CME) event he attended that was supported with an unrestricted grant from a pharmaceutical company. There [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/truth-in-medical-marketing-and-cmes/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Future Doctors Choose Their Specialties</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/how-future-doctors-choose-their-specialties</link>
		<comments>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/how-future-doctors-choose-their-specialties#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Chin, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manifestyourinspiration.com/blognetwork/wordpress/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drs. Paul Ciechanowski and colleagues found that 129 fourth year medical students from Univeristy of Arkansas for Medical Sciences who choose to enter primary care specialties are attracted to a patient centered environment that affords a “secure” relating style. Those who choose to enter non-primary care specialties are attracted to career rewards that afford a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/how-future-doctors-choose-their-specialties/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Google Co-Op for Health</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/new-google-co-op-for-health</link>
		<comments>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/new-google-co-op-for-health#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 05:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Chin, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critical Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health on the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truth in Medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedmedicine.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has created clusters of online discussion format called Co-ops. The Co-op is about &#8220;sharing expertise&#8221; (source: Google Co-Op website), I assume from whoever feel they have expertise to share. A Google employee posted general criteria about what posts would be stricken from a Co-op group: The posting of commercial advertisements or other promotional material [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/new-google-co-op-for-health/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Open Medicine Is and Is Not</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/what-open-medicine-is-and-is-not</link>
		<comments>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/what-open-medicine-is-and-is-not#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 05:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Chin, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activism & Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health on the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient Groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truth in Medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedmedicine.com/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A benefit &#8211; and side effect &#8211; of Internet culture is an embrace toward access and openness. I can access an abundance of free information on the web. I&#8217;ve always embraced open source applications, like the one used to create this website, and will continue to do so as long as it&#8217;s available. However, a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nakedmedicine.com/what-open-medicine-is-and-is-not/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

